UGSpace Repository

Purchaser-provider split: Does theory match evidence in Tasmania?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mohammed, A.K.
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-02T09:49:01Z
dc.date.available 2019-05-02T09:49:01Z
dc.date.issued 2010-12
dc.identifier.other https://doi.org/10.1068/c09115
dc.identifier.other Volume: 28 issue: 6, page(s): 958-977
dc.identifier.uri http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh/handle/123456789/29690
dc.description.abstract I examine the purchaser-provider split in the contexts of two local government areas (Hobart and Sorell) in Tasmania, Australia. I assess whether that split has delivered on the promised effects. I also examine the influence that context has on response outcomes to the purchaser - provider arrangement. Specifically, I pay attention to the impact of purchaser-provider reform on service spending, aggregate municipal spending, and total employment. The evidence shows that the use of the purchaser-provider split is viable only for large programme expenditures. The purchaser - provider split is not related to total municipal spending even though it may be negatively related to the programmes that are subject to it. Savings from purchaser-provider reform result in increased spending and therefore employment elsewhere in the local authority. Greater efficiency gains in some jurisdictions are attributable more to particular local favourable contextual conditions than to the purchaser-provider split per se. © 2010 Pion Ltd and its Licensors. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy en_US
dc.title Purchaser-provider split: Does theory match evidence in Tasmania? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UGSpace


Browse

My Account