Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Tick-borne pathogens of zoonotic and veterinary importance in Nigerian cattle
Authors: Lorusso, V.
Wijnveld, M.
Ayodele, O.M.
Dongkum, C.
Fajinmi, A.
Dogo, A.G.
Thrusfield, M.
Mugenyi, A.
Vaumourin, E.
Igweh, A.C.
Jongejan, M.
Welburn, S.C.
Picozzi, K.
Keywords: Cattle
Tick-borne diseases
Tick-borne pathogens
Issue Date: Sep-2016
Publisher: University of Ghana
Abstract: Vincenzo Lorusso1, Michiel Wijnveld2, Ayodele O. Majekodunmi1, Charles Dongkum3, Akinyemi Fajinmi3, Abraham G. Dogo4, Michael Thrusfield5, Albert Mugenyi1, Elise Vaumourin6, Augustine C. Igweh3, Frans Jongejan2,7, Susan C. Welburn1 and Kim Picozzi1 Background: Ticks and tick-borne diseases undermine cattle fitness and productivity in the whole of sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria. In this West African country, cattle are challenged by numerous tick species, especially during the wet season. Consequently, several TBDs are known to be endemic in Nigerian cattle, including anaplasmosis, babesiosis, cowdriosis and theilerioris (by Theileria mutans and Theileria velifera). To date, all investigations on cattle TBDs in Nigeria have been based on cytological examinations and/or on serological methods. This study aimed to ascertain the occurrence of tick-borne pathogens of veterinary and zoonotic importance in cattle in Nigeria using molecular approaches. Methods: In October 2008, 704 whole blood samples were collected from indigenous cattle in the Plateau State, Nigeria. Analysis for tick-borne pathogens was conducted by means of PCR-based reverse line blotting (RLB) and sequencing targeting a panel of five genera of microorganisms (i.e. Babesia, Theileria, Anaplasma, Ehrlichia and Rickettsia spp.). Results: In total, 561/704 (82.6 %) animals were found infected, with 465 (69.6 %) of them being infected by two or more microorganisms, with up to 77 possible combinations of pathogens detected. Theileria mutans was the most prevalent microorganism (66.3 %), followed by Theileria velifera (52.4 %), Theileria taurotragi (39.5 %), Anaplasma marginale (39.1 %), Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne) (34.7 %), Babesia bigemina (7.9 %), Anaplasma centrale (6.3 %), Anaplasma platys (3.9 %), Rickettsia massiliae (3.5 %), Babesia bovis (2.0 %) and Ehrlichia ruminantium (1.1 %). Calves were found significantly less infected than juvenile and adult cattle. Conclusions: This study provides updated, molecular-based information on cattle TBDs in Nigeria. The molecular approach employed allowed the diagnosis of numerous positive cases including carrier statuses, multiple infections and novel pathogen detections within the indigenous cattle population. Moreover, the RLB method here described enabled the detection of veterinary agents not only pertaining to bovine health, including also those of zoonotic importance. The high prevalence recorded for T. mutans, T. velifera, A. marginale, T. taurotragi and Anaplasma sp. (Omatjenne), suggests they may be endemically established in Nigeria, whereas the lower prevalence recorded for other microorganisms (i.e. A. centrale and B. bovis) highlights a less stable epidemiological scenario, requiring further investigations. Keywords: Cattle, Nigeria, Africa, Tick-borne diseases, Tick-borne pathogens, Zoonoses, Fulani
Appears in Collections:Department of Animal Science

Items in UGSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.